On January 30, attorney Kim Jung Ki appeared on YTN Radio’s “Lee Won Hwa’s Case X File” and discussed the ongoing situation involving Cha Eun Woo. According to Kim, the Seoul Regional Tax Office’s Investigation Bureau No. 4 launched an intense audit against Cha last year, ultimately demanding approximately 20 billion KRW in back taxes.
Authorities suspect that Cha Eun Woo routed personal income through a management company allegedly set up by his mother, potentially as a shell corporation to reduce tax obligations.
Currently enlisted in the military, Cha Eun Woo remains subject to investigation. Attorney Kim stated, “Being a soldier does not exempt him from legal proceedings. Investigators may visit his base or arrange questioning during leave.” He added that even if the alleged crime occurred before enlistment, military prosecutors could coordinate with civilian authorities to carry out the investigation.
Following the controversy, a video featuring Cha Eun Woo on the KFN channel operated by the Ministry of National Defense was taken offline. Meanwhile, a citizen reportedly submitted a formal petition requesting a review of Cha’s assignment to the military band, questioning whether his position remains appropriate amid the ongoing allegations.
The Ministry of Defense confirmed the petition and explained that it was forwarded to Cha’s unit’s inspection office for review. Any personnel decisions, however, fall under the authority of his commanding officers. As Attorney Kim noted, “Only Cha’s superior officers have the discretion to change his assignment, and no external party can interfere with that authority unless they are higher in the chain of command.”
Cha Eun Woo’s agency, Fantagio, issued a statement on January 27, affirming their cooperation with the tax authorities: “The issue is currently being examined through proper legal procedures. Both the agency and artist are fully cooperating within the scope required. Once legal and administrative conclusions are reached, we will take all necessary actions accordingly.”
This unfolding situation has sparked widespread attention, raising questions about the accountability of public figures even while fulfilling national service obligations.
Sources: Daum